You may think MAGA Republicans, criminal presidents and well-educated but semi-conscious public officials are phenomenal, but they, like British colonialists of the last four centuries and crooked cops are the grease that keeps the squeaky wheels of tyranny from being too obvious. Here is a look at the moment a Jewish high priest, presiding over a hearing, decided to assault the witness, an exceptional Jewish male who had become a follower of Yeshua of Nazareth. The account comes from Luke, a physician who accompanied Paul on his journeys throughout Asia. It shows that miscarriages of justice have happened in plain sight and in exceptional environments.
1) Paul, looking intently at the Council, said, “Brethren, I have lived my life with a perfectly good conscience before God up to this day.” 2) The high priest Ananias commanded those standing beside him to strike him on the mouth.” (Acts 23:1-2, NASB)
⚖️ ⛔
I have seen judges muzzle witnesses by threatening a contempt citation and by having them removed from the court, but the levitical High Priest took matters to a personal level that is so low observers could not have failed to notice that assaulting a prisoner or witness was an outrage.
Punch the witness in the mouth

The order given by the president of the high court raises questions about what may have happened behind closed doors to hundreds of nameless people who found themselves outside the fold of New Testament Judaism. An order to punch the witness in open court was clearly given to an officer of the court; it was not a knee jerk reaction by the high priest himself. The violence that accompanies Mosaic law must not be overlooked as a temporary arrangement. Since Canaanites targeted for annihilation and indicted tribes in the neighbourhood could receive mercy and a place in Israel’s daily life we must certainly put shunning, stoning, flogging and physical assault in the history book and leave them there. Judges who are averse to empathizing with defendants and are quick to emphasize the maximum sentence for selected defendants, or side with vigilante justice, are existential threats to justice. We should be ready to see more and similar outrageous behaviours in courts and in the legislatures where traditional values are more important than fixing bad policy and helping citizens to thrive.
Justice trashed despite the appearance



A perfectly good conscience was unconscionable outside of New Testament Judaism
Ananias, the high priest, must have been as ruthless as the Romans who were oppressing the Jewish people, and the people who were likely to attend a hearing to silence a follower of Christ were not going to say anything against anything the hateful mob wanted. So, yes! Punch them in the mouth, for saying “A perfectly good conscience does not allow me to keep following Moses”. Punch them in the mouth and deny them access to the synagogues, cut them off from livelihood and life itself. New Testament Judea was a far cry from the French and American republics. Judea and Samaria were often more like exotic outposts of the PRC and the Russian Federation. That the words “, I have lived my life with a perfectly good conscience before God up to this day“should trigger an illegal reaction in court, is evidence that people’s opinions given under oath hold no water in a court that has lost sight of decency and justice. Such courts are in no position to correct their downward slide into abject hypocrisy and irrelevance.



