If there is a glimmer of unkindness in asking a miracle worker to be the beneficiary of his miracles then there should be no irrationality to demolish the idea that two people agreeing guarantees divine answers. I know that “Physician, heal yourself” was pitched against Yeshua of Nazareth by people who were amazed that a hometown individual was a mover of unprecedented events. We cannot miss the fact that the only success we can track of miracle workers are the prosperity (money making) schemes. There is no evidence that Yeshua was ever leprous, epileptic, paralytic, deaf, mute, or blind, and if he was would we be justified in imagining him waving his divine wand to be seen as a perfectly fit and disease-free specimen, when his life mission was to submit to death? People have every right to ask us to be examples of what we are pushing, and at the point our selling routine is neither cute nor attractive. When the Lord’s Supper is not a memorial of the Lord primary gift then perhaps someone thinks they can improve or update an apostolic foundation. The idea comes from a unique place of misinformation, is deadly, not at all cute or attractive.
And He said to them, “No doubt you will quote this proverb to Me, ‘Physician, heal yourself! Whatever we heard was done at Capernaum, do here in your hometown as well.’”
Luke 4:23, NASB
More papal scams than Christian foundations
I like to think of the things that Christ offers as necessarily fundamental or foundational, and if they were not, then they will be merely fly-by-night operations, a stack of temporary things. So let us recall that the papacy claims that the bread and wine of the Communion Sacrament are a sacrifice, and stack that beside the Protestant practice of keeping the bread and wine as symbols of the Lord’s death.
Body given, not broken, is the means of life
The breaking of the bread for distribution in the covenant meal has nothing to do with Christ’s atoning act, for in laying down his life there was a deliberate avoidance of breaking even a single bone of his body (John 19:36, Exo. 12:46, Psa. 34:20). Attaching the flogging our Lord endured to the most profound act of God is akin to the sons of Israel attaching the entry into Canaan to their compliance with the Sinai Covenant.
And when He had taken some bread and given thanks, He broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is My body which is given for you; do this in remembrance of Me.”
Luke 22:19, NASB
His body, given to facilitate life for the world, is the same as his flesh.
“I am the living bread that came down out of heaven; if anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread also which I will give for the life of the world is My flesh.”
John 6:51, NASB
Why is no one or his sister saying at the Communion Table”Eat this bread and get eternal life”?
Blood poured is life
And in the same way He took the cup after they had eaten, saying, “This cup which is poured out for you is the new covenant in My blood.
Luke 22:20, NASB
It should be clear that the covenant has everything to do with death. What else are “body given” and “blood poured out” in the scheme of atonement? So what is reason for bringing the flogging the Lord endured into the covenant? Cheap distraction thrill seeking.
The Eucharist is neither special presence nor miracle doorway
The celebration of the Lord’s death is not an advancement on the permanent presence of the Holy Spirit, and it is things like this that people are willing to ignore so they can chase a miracle of healing. There is no surprise that the only memorial of the eternal mercy seat in action is watered down into a temporary relief. Healing of even a heart or brain does not alter the need for a new body at the last day. You have to make Christ supremely insensitive to have sick people come to him for headaches on Saturday, toothaches on Sunday, seasonal allergies on Monday, worn out knees on Tuesday, high blood pressure on Wednesday, cancer on Thursday, sickle cell on Friday, and not give anyone a clean bill of health. Saving is permanent and healing is not, even though the same verb (sozo, σώζω) covers both actions.
For as often as you eat this bread and drink the cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death until He comes. (1 Corinthians 11:26, NASB)
Healing through flogging is a demonic doctrine
It is dirt cheap, as are all demonic doctrines, to say that Christ’s flogging might have been needed to authorize healing, because untold thousands were healed in Judea and Samaria before Christ arrived in Pilate’s judgment hall. The idea of atonement includes transfer, such as becoming sin for us is recognized as substitutionary, and no one dares to hint that Christ received the sicknesses and diseases of those he healed. It is part of the bewitching that gets people to major in minors. The death of Christ, understood through blood/death or bread/life, is in a class by itself. Along with people pleading Christ’s blood over finances, personal relationships, trips or buildings, healing through flogging is a distraction, a verifiable case of putting a minor in the place of a major. Why is no one or his sister saying “Eat this bread and get eternal life”?
“Claim your healing” is a manifest example of the flu infected doctor coughing in his patients’ faces. Eating bread and drinking wine to remember and proclaim the Lord’s death is uncomplicated and not susceptible to tampering.
