Fine speeches about Canadian sovereignty is a baby-powder place for Bloc Quebecois leader Blanchet to start or finish taking aim at Canadian politics. It smells all nice and hypnotic if you are are person expecting something world-changing from Canada’s francophones. Canada is not much to write home about even when you are a former separatist trying to convince Quebecers that Canada needs a makeover. The devious smirk on Blanchet’s face disappears into an envious disguise, because Canada’s parliament is still a place where smashers like like him can hide behind the walls of privilege, still he thinks that monarchy is archaic and ridiculous. If Quebec decides whether it is a nation or a province Canadian premiers might see the need to have constitutional talks.

The Bloc’s crossed eyes

Will some one tell the Bloc that only the winning party is tasked with governing the country for four years? Working to bring down the government is juvenile, illegal and satanic. Surely opposition ought to have some constructive criticism? The Bloc represents a shrinking demographic and it might disappear from the political landscape if it does not start addressing what is important to all Canadians. I cannot help but think that the political silos of the Canadian scene are simply delay tactics in accepting the national debt to the First Nations of Canada. Nation-building is apparently beyond the payscale of most parliamentarians. It would not surprise me if people of Canada resorted to extreme local government and abolish the traditions of provincial legislatures and national government and be represented by the city governments. At least we would not be waiting 100 years to see government for all the people in action daily.

A man creates a lie about election fraud in plain sight, whips up an insurrection in plain sight in pursuit of staying in office after losing the election, goes to court 60 times and fails to convince a single judge that American elections are rigged and he is not charged with a crime two years later. This same man walks off with classified documents and insists they are his, lies through his lawyers that he has conducted a diligent search to ensure that he has surrendered all government property, and is found to have yet more, and eighteen months later he is not charged with a crime.  Another man mishandles classified government documents and is indicted and remanded in custody within weeks of the investigation, and that is about one month after the documents appeared online.   I have yet to be convinced that American justice is any more equally applied than the court that found Jesus of Nazareth guilty of blasphemy.  Perhaps people are waiting to see manifest frauds like McConnell, McCarthy, and Graham, Gaetz, Boebert, Green and Jordan confess that the GOP is a death cult, firmly in the grip of legal loopholes and idle patriotism.

Equal Justice, Rare but Still Precious

People with pure minds and unsoiled hands

It is not the great constitutions and common law conventions that define a society.  People with books, supposedly chock-full of divine, and therefore, superior wisdom and guidance, are the most prone to atrocious practices, and history will confirm the fact. Let us not think that people in China, Russia, Ukraine, Israel, Venezuela, Mexico do not recognize the massive failures of two Booked people, the Muslim and the Jew.  The more observant one becomes in either of these two traditions, the more unlikely is any kind of peace, truce or  detente between the communities.

The hounds of mifepristone and women

Justices Alito and Thomas write dissenting opinions to the Texas judge’s ruling against a drug serving women’s health because they are the most unapologetically MAGA-minded justices, and Thomas for sure, is the most bribe-compromised.  The other seven keep their opinions secret because it is too embarrassing to be seen questioning scientific research or they may be afraid (!) of the MAGA mob. Views such as these held by justices of the Supreme Court are not as contorted as the views of Christians who see the cross (✝️) and can only bring themselves to talk about the pain that Christ endured.  All the talk that focuses on the passion as if it was an instance of injustice misses the mark by a thousand light years.  God’s justice, His show of righteous is not acceptable to self-righteous and brainwashed believers.  Believers who say they are saved and owe God something in recognition of his incomparable gift are bribe-compromised and filthy dreamers.  God’s gift of salvation via the cross has no “buts”

Never grasping the meaning of FREE and RIGHTEOUSNESS

It has not been more clear that what people call righteousness and what God offers as righteousness are two different animals.

“But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who believe; for there is no distinction; for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ Jesus; whom God displayed publicly as a propitiation in His blood through faith. This was to demonstrate His righteousness, because in the forbearance of God He passed over the sins previously committed;”

Romans 3:21-25

HUMAN OBEDIENCE to God’s law is a joke, a childish game, a hit and miss routine, a try and try again shooting gallery, an ever-learning and never-graduate school.  None of those believers who are committed to keeping all of God’s law will accept their children’s repeating disobedience, yet they keep repeating the mantra of “keeping God’s commandments” without a line on Jesus who died and rose from the dead to bring them righteousness or justification.  Do they really believe that Christ justified sinners by not breaking any of God’s (Ten) Commandments, or did he justify people by dying and rising from the dead?

“Whatever you ask in My name, that will I do, so that the Father may be glorified in the Son.” (John 14:13, NASB)

How close we can come to calling GOD a liar can be illustrated by the way we weaken the force of this saying.

• We never say, “We must have a clear conscience” following 1 John 3:21
• We say, “We must be doing God’s will” to get what we ask for, meaning one must be sinless, following 1 John 3:21
• We say, “we cannot ask for mere consumables”, taking a cue from James 4:2
• We say, “We must ask in accordance with God’s will”; he will only give what is in his will

Does whatever mean whatever?

The British and American peoples are neither Israel nor Judah. The late Herbert W. Armstrong, a well-known heretic, posing as a scholar of biblical matters, made a lastng impression on many in the last century when he used to circle the globe assuring people that Christ has a plan for the government of world. Beyond that, Mr. Armstrong was just another White man trying to make the case for white supremacy.  The United States and the United Kingdom are a truly strange phenomenon because they are anything but united, and their roots seldom match their fruits.

There is no case for global Mosaic government

The coming world government will not be based on Levitical conventions, nor on the Sinai Covenant. Who, after carefully examining the wordfs and works of the Anointed King of Israel, Yeshua aof Nazareth, would presume to place the welfare of the entire globe on the juvnile pride in days, months, years, food and drink, and perishable rituals? Not me.

No genuine Christian witness turns the keys of the kingdom over to Moses

Ten Comandments, the observation of days, months, years,  have never been the focus of anyone in the chirch of Jesus Christ except those supposedly converted Jews who thought that the Church was just another sect of Judaism.  The New Testament witnesses to James, the Lord’s brother, leading a faction dominated by Pharisees who harassed the early disciples to become followers of accept circumcision and to adopt the law of Moses as the foundation of the Messianic kindgom. Paul called the whole shebang juvenile rubbish.  They failed, and yet today, two millennia later, we still can still observe the distinction between the Spirit’s leading and the incitement of demons.

Crowned heads and David

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons, by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron, men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth.

1 Timothy 4:1-3, NASB

The British and American people speak neither Hebrew, Aramaic, or any related language. They both have denied people the right to marry, particularly interracial marriage, just as Jew-Gentile ordinary interactions were forbidden.  They have not demonstrated any readiness to adopt the best of the Israel’s patriarchal, levitical, or royal traditions.  David never made slaves of foreigners, and he had no delusions of empire.  The British and American peoples have embraced the worst traits of ancient Israel: xenophobia, inhumanity to humans and animals, racism, genocidal traits, and the love of hypocrisy.  All the talk about the Ten Commandments as supreme instruction can never erase the crimes all three have committed.  Their whoredom – sipping at every fountain – is increasingly apparent, and all the hype about keeping the Ten Commandments is a denial of Yeshua’s own teaching about righteousness.  Man’s essential problem is not a legal issue; it is is trust matter.  How do we know?  The solution to sin is not law, but faith in the Son of God.  The key to salvation is not correcting behaviour, but exercising faith and accepting a new layer to hope, interpersonal connections, and reliability.

Salvation is a today and one-by-one thing, not a future government

Mr. Weston’s refried beans dinner of British and American Israelitism and a deadly dabble in politics will remain fringe and cultish.  He and Mr. Armstrong have never demonstrated even the  elementary submission to the sovereignty of Yeshua.  They have failed to connect with the apostles’ witness concerning Yeshua’s death and resurrection.  Who gives a rodent’s rear end if the Scots and Brits sincerely believe that they have a stone from the experience of Jacob?  When His Majesty Charles III takes the throne, it will not matter if an ancient stone is under him but whether the vows he makes to honour God and serve the people are genuine.  Ancient does not make right or ideal.